Skip to main content

Slimy Kobe Trying to Rip People off

I have been a fan of Kobe Bryant's game ever since I saw him in the 1999 playoff loss to the San Antonio Spurs. While I have always enjoyed his creativity, skill and finesse, my perception of the man has never been glamourous. He is selfish and narcisstic beyond I can defend, even though I have for many many years. Almost everything he does on the court has a certain motive which is rarely wholesome.

What ticks me off about Kobe now is his latest marketing ploy for his Nike shoes. His official website claims that he wore his Nike Hyperdunks (which came out in the middle of 2008) until December 16, 2008. At that point, he switched to the new (and not-yet-released) Nike ZKIVs.

Here are his stats with the Hyperdunks and ZKIVs.

24 GAMES WITH HYPERDUNK: OCTOBER 28 – DECEMBER 16
PPG: 25.0
FG%: 46.1
3-PT%: 29.5

12 GAMES WITH ZKIV: DECEMBER 19 – JANUARY 11
PPG: 30.8
FG%: 52.0
3-PT%: 48.9

They go on to say:
His game has been elevated to amazing new heights over the past month, and the increased production corresponds exactly with the introduction of his new sneaker.

Coincidence? Obviously there are a variety of factors that play into statistical trends, but you simply can’t deny the staggering numbers Kobe has generated over the past 12 games while wearing the Nike Zoom Kobe IVs.
To attribute the vast difference in his stats to the kind of shoes he wore is so dishonest and crude it makes me very angry. There is little cause and effect relationship between shoes and efficiency, yet Kobe and Nike have no problem trying to profit from an artificial correlation. I pity the sucker who would spend (or cost his Mommy) $150 on a pair of ZKIVs expecting his game to improve vastly.

There is no way in hell a $100-$150 pair of shoes improve the efficiency of a $20-million-making NBA star by 20%!! The stats have a lot more to do with his shot selection, the quality of Lakers opponents during each span, Lakers home-heavy schedule in the 12 games with the ZKIV. It would not surprise me one bit if Kobe sabotaged some games to skew his stats such that they point to a correlation between his shoes and scoring efficiency.

Another reason the correlation between Kobe's shoes and scoring efficiency is fake is that he has had so many stretches in his career where his efficiency is high for extended periods of time and low for others. The one consistent stat is that he shoots 45+/-2% from the field every year. Whether he is wearing Addidas or Nike, latest Hyperdunks or Zooms, Kobe is bound to take bad shots, make some incredible ones and miss some easy ones.

So, for Kobe and Nike to exploit the fake correlation between Kobe's shoes and scoring is as disingenous and fake as Kobe himself. That is why, while I have been enamored by Kobe's game, I have never trusted or put much passion on the man and what he represents.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Correlation Between Taxes and Social/Economic Programs

I have always wondered if the taxes people pay correlate with the availability of social and economic programs and safety nets, not to mention the military programs that protect them. This idea comes in light of the notion that Europeans are highly taxed compared to their American counterparts, but they seem to have access to free (or almost free) education and health care while the US provides neither. The Europeans live and work at a more leisurely pace than Americans and they have the comfort of knowing that their government has put safety nets in case a disaster. The Europeans do a lot to ensure that all their citizens have comparable opportunities, and thus you are less likely to see a huge gap between the poor and the rich. Perhaps the lack of incentive to excel has stifled entrepreneurship and innovation in Europe to some extent. In fact, Europe has historically high unemployment rates than the US and the size of government there is significantly larger than that of the US....

Microsoft Gone Wild

NBC and Microsoft have formed an intricate partnership in which Microsoft serves to expand and maintain NBC's presence in the online news and entertainment market while promoting its products. NBC online integrates many of Microsoft's products. MSNBC is co-owned by GE's NBC universal and Microsoft. I have no problem with the partnership, except for the way Microsoft pushes people to use Microsoft products while other alternatives do just as well or better. Let me provide some examples. You can't access NBC online videos unless you have a Windows media plugin. What about using Flash like everybody else. If you want to access Olympics games online at NBC Olympics, you better be using a Windows or a Mac because Microsoft does not have a Linux version of the Silverlight plugin that it is pushing hard in competition with Adobe Flash, the industry standard. Suppose you are using Windows, you pay a huge penalty for not using Internet Explorer!! Try watching videos with In...

The Pervasive Mac vs. Windows vs. Linux Analogy

I'm sure everyone has seen the Mac vs. PC ads on TV where the Mac appears to be confident while th PC is in denial about its deficiencies. Missing from that picture is Linux which is robust, but seeks no attention because it has no commercial ambitions. This Mac vs. PC vs. Linux model can serve as a analogy for many things/phenomena. I would like to make a list of those analogies here. For example, The New York Times recently characterized Hillary as a PC and Obama as a mac on the basis of the design of their websites. The analogy would also work if you think of Hillary as the status quo much like Windows, and Obama as the new thing with great promise, cachet and appeal like the newly reborn mac. It is not obvious who would play the role of Linux, but my choice would be Ron Paul. He has some bold and independent ideas along with a very loyal following even though he has no chance of winning. PC Mac Linux Candidate Hillary Clinton Barack Obama Ron Paul States Northeast West Co...