Skip to main content

Solving the Power Jack Problem with Certain HP/Compaq Notebooks

I have owned (and loved) my HP Pavilion zt3340us notebook for the last 3 years. It had taken the excessive use and abuse of some 10+ hours/day without any significant upgrade or repair until about a year ago when it's power adapter started acting up. I promptly bought an after-market (non-OEM) replacement($45) which lasted for some 6 months before dying itself. Following another replacement of the power adapter($30) and the purchase of a brand new after-market battery($50), the power issues persisted in different forms. Particularly, the power jack was getting too loose to charge up the battery or even consistently power the notebook. For a while, I compromised the mobility of the notebook by removing the battery, but soon the loose connection started oscillating so much that it was causing overheating around the power jack connection. The overheating led to some abrupt(thermal) shutdowns and an inability to reboot the notebook for days at a time. That basically deemed the notebook useless for all purposes.

Unwilling to part with what seemed to be a notebook that still had some use, I surfed the web looking for solutions. That's when I realized the power jack problem has been all too common among certain HP/Compaq notebooks. The problem was well-documented
http://www.howtofixcomputers.com/bb/ftopic73146-0.html
http://www.notebookforums.com/thread173313.html
http://opinionatedmarketers.blogspot.com/2008/01/jacked-by-hp-power-jack-problem.html
and many unhappy customers have been scheming about a possible class-action suit against HP's defective design and its unwillingness to help repair defective notebooks or do a recall. The high incidence of the power jack problems has led to many technicians charging top dollars (~$200) to fix this problem. So, I sought my alternatives carefully:
  1. Replace the whole motherboard
    • CONS: A used bare motherboard (missing CPU, GPU, memory, Wifi card, fan ..) costs some $200 on eBay.
    • CONS: It will probably have the same power jack issues down the road.
    • Cost: ~$200
  2. Replace power jack myself - there is a hack
    • CONS: some pieces need to be soldered, but I don't own a soldering tool
    • CONS: Too invasive - notebooks are easy to screw up.
    • Cost: <$50
  3. Get power jack replaced
    • People have made a business out of this opportunity
    • Cost: ~$200
  4. Use a docking station
    • HP docking stations have their own power inlet and they can power a whole notebooks
    • COST: $20 (look on eBay like I have. MSRP is ~$180)
I went with the HP docking station and at a cost of $20 and a whole lot of frustration, my notebook is back up and running, even if it is not quite as mobile. The HP DC367B Port Replicator PR1001 Docking Station below cost a mere $8 (+$12 for S&H).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Acroread Startup in OpenSuSe 11.0

It takes more than 30 seconds for acroread to load on my Opensuse machine the first time and the startup time gets shorter in subsequent attempts. Why? This is not the first time I have come across this problem of slow application startups in OpenSuse. Apparently a lot of people had encountered this problem and they found a simple solution - uninstalling the version of acroread that comes with OpenSuse and installing one from Adobe site yourself. Fortunately, that prescription seems to have solved the problem. My acroread startup time is a few seconds now. Why does a very good Linux distribution like OpenSuse with its wide support and following make so many of these mistakes?!?! Over the years, I have seen Suse/OpenSuse sending buggy distributions that make you wonder if they do much testing before releasing their distro. Here are a few bugs I have come across: The extremely slow startup of Openoffice in OpenSuse 10.0 was one of the reasons I switched to Fedora Core for a while...

Tax-and-spend Liberal My Ass

This is a continuation of my earlier posts on economic performance of democratic and republican administrations. My earlier posts include: Politics of the Federal Minimum Wage Democrats Have Kept Unemployment Low Democrats care about poor people Truth About Economic Performance of Political Parties I like to think I have shed light on some facts and debunked some conventional wisdom. In this post, I will attempt to examine the tax-and-spend liberal label put on democrats. Republicans often try to label democrats as tax-and-spend liberals who are soft on national security. While the latter point is based on anecdotal evidence, the earlier is amenable to empirical examination. So, I set out to prove or disprove the notion that democrats often tax and spend in a way that does not yield economic growth. The implication of tax-and-spend liberal is one that puts excessive tax burden on its population and finds inefficient (think socialistic) ways of spending that tax reven...

Correlation Between Taxes and Social/Economic Programs

I have always wondered if the taxes people pay correlate with the availability of social and economic programs and safety nets, not to mention the military programs that protect them. This idea comes in light of the notion that Europeans are highly taxed compared to their American counterparts, but they seem to have access to free (or almost free) education and health care while the US provides neither. The Europeans live and work at a more leisurely pace than Americans and they have the comfort of knowing that their government has put safety nets in case a disaster. The Europeans do a lot to ensure that all their citizens have comparable opportunities, and thus you are less likely to see a huge gap between the poor and the rich. Perhaps the lack of incentive to excel has stifled entrepreneurship and innovation in Europe to some extent. In fact, Europe has historically high unemployment rates than the US and the size of government there is significantly larger than that of the US....