Skip to main content

Reasons to Vote for Barack Obama

Not that I am eligible to vote or anything ... but if I could, I would vote for Barack Obama for the following reasons.

  1. He listens to experts. He has assembled a group of smart and practical intellectuals to advise him on all sorts of topics. Hillary has her own agenda and ambition which appears to keep her from entertaining any "elitist" agenda.

  2. He is a good manager. The way he hired very intelligent people to run a nearly flawless campaign to beat an established and seemingly unbeatable opponent in Hillary Clinton is commendable. He really knows how to surround himself with a smart group of people who can get things done and that is exactly what this country needs. Hillary hired people on the basis of their loyalty and counted on friends of the Clintons to win her the nomination. Unfortunately, all that influence and political capital could not overcome the grassroots movement Obama initiated.

  3. He is not an ideologue. That allows him to make good decisions for this country of diverse ideologies. He is a less polarizing figure because he is not a dogmatic ideologue.

  4. He is a uniter. He does not demonize his opponents. He is willing to listen to people with very different opinions from his own.

  5. He says no to lobbyists. While I think the influence of lobbyists is somewhat overstated, if I am given a choice between someone whose campaign is infested with (McCain) and run by (Hillary) registered lobbyists or one that is free of such influence, I would pick the lobbyist-free campaign every time.

  6. He is not a fear-monger. Well, he might be a hope-monger, but I would take a hope-monger over a fear-monger any day of the week except on Sundays. (I say no to organized religion).

  7. He is smart. Hillary might be equally smart, but she is more of a Dr. Evil kind of smart. You wouldn't want that, would you? I can imagine her saying "it's President Clinton. I didn't stay married to my cheating husband to be called 'Senator'. Thank you very much."

  8. He is an accomplished legislator. Contrary to the claims that he is all talk and no substance, he has accomplished a lot during his 8-yr tenure in the Illinois State Senate where he has sponsored more than 800 bills. See for yourself. His three years in the US Senate have also been very productive by any measure. He has ascended the power ladder in the Senate so as to achieve a higher legislative score than both Clinton (8 years in the Senate) and McCain (21 year veteran in the Senate) in just 3 years, according to Congress.org. His overall rank in the Senate is virtually tied with Clinton and McCain, but he only needed 3 years to achieve such success.

  9. He knows how to run things. Sure he wasn't an ex-governor or CEO, but he has run a $250+ million campaign over the last 18 months better than anybody could have imagined.

  10. He is a leader. Anyone questioning this claim better look at all the people he has inspired and mobilized.

  11. He has good judgment. I am not just talking about his opposition to the the Iraq War, but the decisions he has made in this campaign which speak volumes about his decision-making ability.

  12. Last but not least, as a person of color, I would love to see another person of color doing the most important job in the world.
... more to come in the future.

Here are some articles that outline Obama's success and Hillary's failures.

Top 10 Reasons Obama Defeated Clinton for the Democratic Nomination
By Robert Creamer, Huffington Post.

Why Appalachia Will Not Save Hillary Clinton - Skirting Appalachia by Charles M. Blow

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Distribution of Wealth in the US

The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. I heard this statement quite a bit lately particularly in light of the sub-prime mortgage and general housing crisis in the US. The country has enjoyed significant economic prosperity and both Clinton and Bush boasted economic growth under their reign. Unfortunately, the beneficiaries of the economic boom are not people from all economic backgrounds, but rather the top 10%. To make things worse, Bush gave tax cuts mainly targeting the top 10%. Being more of a numbers guy, I always wanted showing the validity of the-rich-get-richer-n-the-poor-get-poorer statement. Thanks to Wikipedia , I have finally found it!! Both the mean and median net worth of families for the bottom 50% of the population has remained absolutely flat while the 75th-90th percentile see a decent growth and the top 10% enjoy the most appreciation on their net worth. So, if you factor in inflation, the-rich-get-richer-n-the-poor-get-poorer probably holds true. The g...
1 comment
Read more

IPtables, SVN, and NMAP

I reviewed some material on IPtables, SVN, and NMAP just for the sake of keeping my mind busy. Here are some useful notes: IPtables - best resource found at HERE SVN - best, as in the quickest and simplest intro could be found HERE NMAP - I honestly don't see in using it for more than port-scanning in a few instances. Anyway, here are a few other options that might come in handy at some point. nmap -sT/sS/ sX/sF/...[-P0] IPADDRESS(range) == to check which ports are open nmap -sP IPADDRESS(range) == a simple ping scan for availability nmap -sO IPADDRESS(range) == check what IP protocols are available nmap -sV IPADDRESS(range) == a scan with version detection Other useful flags: -O == detects OS, part of -v (verbosity) flag as well -A == detects OS and versions -v == request high verbosity/detail -F == performs a fast scan of only a few common ports Installing Perl modules Perl modules may be installed using the CPAN module or from source. SOURCE...
Post a Comment
Read more