Skip to main content

Disincentives for Driving

It is no secret that people in the US drive a lot, and they rely on their personal vehicles for the majority of their transportation needs. Slight increases in the price of gas or concerns about the environment have done little to curb the country's fuel consumption significantly. The three Detroit automakers always seem behind the curve on every technology including fuel efficiency. No wonder they are all on the brink of bankruptcy. Citizens seem uncompromising when it comes to their right to drive cheaply. Is there any way to cut down on fuel consumption by US drivers? Freakonomicists STEPHEN J. DUBNER and STEVEN D. LEVITT suggest introducing disincentives for driving could be effective.

What disincentives do they entertain?
  1. Congestion pricing which 'penalizes' those who drive in congested areas has been effectively applied in Singapore and London, but has received a lot of resistance in Manhattan.
  2. Pay-as-you-drive (PAYD) Insurance - This way, those who drive more will pay a higher car insurance, other things being equal. Progressive is apparently offering such a program called MyRate.
Two disincentives they don't discuss are a possible increase in gas tax and introduction of pollution tax. Here are my ideas on those subjects.

Increasing the Gas Tax:

The 18.4cent/gallon federal gas tax that Hillary Clinton and John McCain irresponsibly proposed to suspend for the summer are by far the lowest for any developed nation. If you include state gas tax, people in the US pay an average of 47cents/gallon in gas tax and that constitutes only 15% of the cost of gas.

In Europe and rest of the developed world, the national gas tax accounts for some 60%-65% of the enormous gas prices. That is the reason why people in many parts of the world pay:

1. Eritrea .................$9.58
2. Norway ...............$8.73
3. Britain .................$8.38
4. Netherlands ........$8.37
5. Monaco ...............$8.31
6. Iceland ................$8.28
7. Belgium ..............$8.22
8. France ................$8.07
9. Germany ...........$7.86
10. Portugal ...........$7.84
108. USA ..........$3.45

Source: Airinc/CNN, based on surveys of 155 countries between March 17 and April 1, 2008.

(A more complete and up-to-date list of gas prices around the world is found on Wikipedia.)

While a large gas tax does hurt consumers, it does discourage driving as they have in Europe. Europeans have a very reliable public transit system, but the US could increase the federal+state gas tax slowly and invest that money back into improving its public transit system. Tom Friedman of The New York Times suggests that politicians set $4.00/gallon as the base and tell the public that the era of cheap gas is over. It might be an unpopular position for a politician to take, but something that is badly needed.

Those who drive will shift towards more fuel efficient vehicles if gas prices are high. Those who are reluctant to pay a premium for a hybrid car will be more willing because the return on their investment comes quickly. In the meantime, not-so-green manufacturers will adapt or die. The pressure on both drivers and auto manufacturers will quickly push fuel efficiency averages in the US. At the moment, those numbers are atrocious, as you can see in this graphic from this Christian Science Monitor article.

Pollution Tax:
One way to implement carbon tax on regular drivers is to add a little penalty to people every year when it is time to renew their tag. people would pay a proportional carbon tax on the basis of:
  1. How much they drove over the past year
  2. The fuel efficiency of their vehicle
It seems pretty easy to implement. It is a matter of legislators to sign these controversial and unpopular ideas into law.
All in all, I am in favor of rewarding green and environmentally conservative behavior and punishing the contrary. Disincentives fall in the category of punishing unfavorable behavior, which in turn promotes good behavior.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Acroread Startup in OpenSuSe 11.0

It takes more than 30 seconds for acroread to load on my Opensuse machine the first time and the startup time gets shorter in subsequent attempts. Why? This is not the first time I have come across this problem of slow application startups in OpenSuse. Apparently a lot of people had encountered this problem and they found a simple solution - uninstalling the version of acroread that comes with OpenSuse and installing one from Adobe site yourself. Fortunately, that prescription seems to have solved the problem. My acroread startup time is a few seconds now. Why does a very good Linux distribution like OpenSuse with its wide support and following make so many of these mistakes?!?! Over the years, I have seen Suse/OpenSuse sending buggy distributions that make you wonder if they do much testing before releasing their distro. Here are a few bugs I have come across: The extremely slow startup of Openoffice in OpenSuse 10.0 was one of the reasons I switched to Fedora Core for a while...
1 comment
Read more

Tax-and-spend Liberal My Ass

This is a continuation of my earlier posts on economic performance of democratic and republican administrations. My earlier posts include: Politics of the Federal Minimum Wage Democrats Have Kept Unemployment Low Democrats care about poor people Truth About Economic Performance of Political Parties I like to think I have shed light on some facts and debunked some conventional wisdom. In this post, I will attempt to examine the tax-and-spend liberal label put on democrats. Republicans often try to label democrats as tax-and-spend liberals who are soft on national security. While the latter point is based on anecdotal evidence, the earlier is amenable to empirical examination. So, I set out to prove or disprove the notion that democrats often tax and spend in a way that does not yield economic growth. The implication of tax-and-spend liberal is one that puts excessive tax burden on its population and finds inefficient (think socialistic) ways of spending that tax reven...
Post a Comment
Read more

Correlation Between Taxes and Social/Economic Programs

I have always wondered if the taxes people pay correlate with the availability of social and economic programs and safety nets, not to mention the military programs that protect them. This idea comes in light of the notion that Europeans are highly taxed compared to their American counterparts, but they seem to have access to free (or almost free) education and health care while the US provides neither. The Europeans live and work at a more leisurely pace than Americans and they have the comfort of knowing that their government has put safety nets in case a disaster. The Europeans do a lot to ensure that all their citizens have comparable opportunities, and thus you are less likely to see a huge gap between the poor and the rich. Perhaps the lack of incentive to excel has stifled entrepreneurship and innovation in Europe to some extent. In fact, Europe has historically high unemployment rates than the US and the size of government there is significantly larger than that of the US....
Post a Comment
Read more