Skip to main content

Krugman on Public Transit

I love reading Paul Krugman's The New York Times blog. His attempts to make sense of the world using hard economic data appeals to the "numbers guy" and "amateur economist" in me. While almost everything Prof. Krugman posts is noteworthy, I will share his comments on public transportation today.
Published: May 11, 2008
In case you’re wondering, I didn’t write about public transit for tomorrow. But I did some homework on the thought that I might, and might as well put it here. So here’s Exhibit A for the proposition that even in a nation with low overall population density, where the antelope roam and the skies are not [...]
It is amazing how little most US cities have done to make public transportation a more feasible option. I think one of the major ways the US can minimize its dependence on oil is to invest more in urban public transportation infrastructure. The 2000 US Census shows that 58% of the US population is concentrated in urban areas with 200,000+ people. If that population starts using public transportation with regularity, the US could be much less dependent on oil.
Published: May 10, 2008
We’re #1 OK, I knew that US public transit was pathetic compared with Western Europe; but if you try to talk about Europe, people start going on about population density, as if we all lived in Montana or something. Anyway, Canada has lots of open space, too — and it doesn’t even have $8 a gallon gas. [...]
Thanks to personal automobile accounting for 89% of the US transportation modes, the US, which constitutes 5% of the world's population, consumes 25% of the world's oil production. I envy the Dutch and Scandinavian lifestyle of riding bikes, walking, using windmills to generate power ...
Published: May 10, 2008
The Times reports that ridership on mass transit is surging thanks to high gasoline prices. Good. But … as of 2005, only 4.7 percent of American workers took mass transit to work. So even a 10% surge in mass transit ridership would take only around half a percent of drivers off the road. The point isn’t that [...]

Public transit accounts for only 4.7% of the transportation modes in the US. The more startling number is probably the 77.0% of the people who drive alone!! There is a lot of room for people to make sacrifices to carpool or use public transportation. It appears the rising cost of gas might push people to consider those options.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Distribution of Wealth in the US

The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. I heard this statement quite a bit lately particularly in light of the sub-prime mortgage and general housing crisis in the US. The country has enjoyed significant economic prosperity and both Clinton and Bush boasted economic growth under their reign. Unfortunately, the beneficiaries of the economic boom are not people from all economic backgrounds, but rather the top 10%. To make things worse, Bush gave tax cuts mainly targeting the top 10%. Being more of a numbers guy, I always wanted showing the validity of the-rich-get-richer-n-the-poor-get-poorer statement. Thanks to Wikipedia , I have finally found it!! Both the mean and median net worth of families for the bottom 50% of the population has remained absolutely flat while the 75th-90th percentile see a decent growth and the top 10% enjoy the most appreciation on their net worth. So, if you factor in inflation, the-rich-get-richer-n-the-poor-get-poorer probably holds true. The g

An Exercise in Obstinacy, Deception, and Self-Destruction

There is no other way to describe the policies of the current leadership in Eritrea. Please watch this appalling interview of the Eritrean President Isaias Afewerki with Riz Khan of Aljazeera and come up with your own series of adjectives to describe that incredible exchange. The fact that Eritreans are dying under the oppressive and misguided dictatorship of Isaias Afeworki frightens and saddens me very much. The fact that there is no immediate hope is downright depressing.

Victim of Asylum Roulette

Not too many stories resonate with me as much as the plight of legitimate asylum seekers whose desperate plea to find refuge in the US is ultimately decided by the questionable preference, judgment and mood of a single asylum officer (with some oversight from a regional asylum director) on one fateful day. That decision, according to numerous credible and through studies, depends largely on the location of the regional asylum center, the legal representation of the the applicant, the gender of the asylum officer just as much as the merit of the asylum case, while in fact the legitimacy of the asylum case should be the only relevant factor. This phenomenon has become so real that researchers at the Georgetown University law school have dubbed it the Refugee Roulette . Why am I so sensitive about this subject? My most devastating tragedy of late has been the denial of my legitimate and honest application for political asylum at the Chicago Asylum Office. When I applied believing the