Skip to main content

Americans Driving Less Already

According to this report from the Department of Transportation, Americans have cut down their driving by 4.3% (11 billion miles) in March 2008 compared to March 2007. I assume the cutback is largely a response to record high gas prices. Many economists assume the demand for gas to be price-inelastic since gas is a necessity and there are few immediate alternatives to the usage of gas. However, in a country like the US where people drive excessively and consume gas with little guilt or cost, there was room for people's consumption of gas to respond to its price.

Since the price of gas has gone up by some 70 cents for a gallon from March until June 2008, I assume there is a sustained reduction in the consumption of gas which will continue so long as gas prices keep their upward swing.

The fact that gas prices have gone up so much despite a cutback in consumption in the US is a clear indication that the price hikes are independent of supply-demand in the US. It probably has more to do with the much-discussed demand in emerging markets.

I wanted to figure out how much people in the US saved through their cutbacks. Assuming an average car gives 20 MPG and that the national average cost of gas in March 2008 was about $3.20/gallon, people would have saved $1.8 billion.

What about the price elasticity of gasoline on the basis of this data?

%Change in the consumption of gas in March 2007 compared to March 2008 = 4.3
%Change in the price of gas from March 2007 to March 2008 = (3.30-2.60)/2.60*100 = 26.9

The price elasticity of demand is thus 4.3/26.9 = 0.16, which is considered fairly inelastic. Anyway, it is a more significant response than I expected.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Correlation Between Taxes and Social/Economic Programs

I have always wondered if the taxes people pay correlate with the availability of social and economic programs and safety nets, not to mention the military programs that protect them. This idea comes in light of the notion that Europeans are highly taxed compared to their American counterparts, but they seem to have access to free (or almost free) education and health care while the US provides neither. The Europeans live and work at a more leisurely pace than Americans and they have the comfort of knowing that their government has put safety nets in case a disaster. The Europeans do a lot to ensure that all their citizens have comparable opportunities, and thus you are less likely to see a huge gap between the poor and the rich. Perhaps the lack of incentive to excel has stifled entrepreneurship and innovation in Europe to some extent. In fact, Europe has historically high unemployment rates than the US and the size of government there is significantly larger than that of the US....
Post a Comment
Read more

Microsoft Gone Wild

NBC and Microsoft have formed an intricate partnership in which Microsoft serves to expand and maintain NBC's presence in the online news and entertainment market while promoting its products. NBC online integrates many of Microsoft's products. MSNBC is co-owned by GE's NBC universal and Microsoft. I have no problem with the partnership, except for the way Microsoft pushes people to use Microsoft products while other alternatives do just as well or better. Let me provide some examples. You can't access NBC online videos unless you have a Windows media plugin. What about using Flash like everybody else. If you want to access Olympics games online at NBC Olympics, you better be using a Windows or a Mac because Microsoft does not have a Linux version of the Silverlight plugin that it is pushing hard in competition with Adobe Flash, the industry standard. Suppose you are using Windows, you pay a huge penalty for not using Internet Explorer!! Try watching videos with In...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Pervasive Mac vs. Windows vs. Linux Analogy

I'm sure everyone has seen the Mac vs. PC ads on TV where the Mac appears to be confident while th PC is in denial about its deficiencies. Missing from that picture is Linux which is robust, but seeks no attention because it has no commercial ambitions. This Mac vs. PC vs. Linux model can serve as a analogy for many things/phenomena. I would like to make a list of those analogies here. For example, The New York Times recently characterized Hillary as a PC and Obama as a mac on the basis of the design of their websites. The analogy would also work if you think of Hillary as the status quo much like Windows, and Obama as the new thing with great promise, cachet and appeal like the newly reborn mac. It is not obvious who would play the role of Linux, but my choice would be Ron Paul. He has some bold and independent ideas along with a very loyal following even though he has no chance of winning. PC Mac Linux Candidate Hillary Clinton Barack Obama Ron Paul States Northeast West Co...
Post a Comment
Read more