The Onion characterizes Bush's tax policy as follows:
One would hope McCain and Obama have better policies. As a "number's guy," I wanted to see real numbers showing how the tax proposals of the presidential candidates really look. Luckily, the Urban-Brooking Tax Policy Center has crunched the numbers and summarized their findings.
For the more graphically-inclined, this picture might help better.
-----------
The bottomline is that Obama's plan clearly favors helping the poor and middle class while McCain's helps the rich a lot more than it does the poor. If an individual's tax burden is a key factor in determining who people vote for, I can't imagine 80+% of the country voting for McCain over Obama. In plain terms, Obama's plan favors 80+% of the population while McCain's fattens the richest 20%. Those who justify McCain's plan using principles of supply-side economics should realize that there are plenty of instances where those principles fail, the last 7 years being a prime example.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24ab2/24ab20ebc6e6ec04c7a804fe976bb29d1e4ec034" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/356bf/356bfbb1983b5aa466e94cf2adc126d41496419d" alt=""
2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6f7e/e6f7e49de529991bf26b8b4cfe7678d8119f89c7" alt=""
2012
The bottomline is that Obama's plan clearly favors helping the poor and middle class while McCain's helps the rich a lot more than it does the poor. If an individual's tax burden is a key factor in determining who people vote for, I can't imagine 80+% of the country voting for McCain over Obama. In plain terms, Obama's plan favors 80+% of the population while McCain's fattens the richest 20%. Those who justify McCain's plan using principles of supply-side economics should realize that there are plenty of instances where those principles fail, the last 7 years being a prime example.
Comments