Skip to main content

OpenSuSE 11.0 Review

SuSE 9.2 was my first OS I installed on my laptop 3+ years ago within an hour of getting my much-awaited notebook. SuSE 9.3 lasted me for almost a year before Novell's decision to fork a version of SuSE into the community-supported OpenSuSE. Like most SuSE fans, I tolerated the buggy and unstable nature of OpenSuSE for a short while before ditching it for other distros, particularly Ubuntu. Thus, the announcement of the highly anticipated OpenSuSE 11,0 was a very welcome news. Having played around with OpenSuSE 11.0 for the last five days, I am very convinced that SuSE is back to where it used to be -- leading. Here is a brief review.
  1. The installation is very easy and smooth. I performed a network install without a hitch from the TDS mirror in Madison, Wisconsin.
  2. YaST doesn't break as easily as it used to. At least it hasn't happened yet.
  3. Installing software repositories used to be a pain. One would have to look up the info about the repos and enter it manually. Most of these repos were in Germany and connecting to them used to be a challenge, not to mention a common reason for breaking YaST. Now, it takes a few clicks to include these repos.
  4. There is no default desktop environment, unlike in the past where SuSE clearly favored KDE. This time, people have the option of choosing between GNOME, KDE 3.5.9, KDE 4.0, or Xfce during the installation process. I was very disappointed with KDE 4.0 yet again, so I decided to revert back to KDE 3.5.9 which I love.
  5. Firefox 3.0 comes standard and it is a major improvement over an already robust Firefox 2.0.
  6. XEN virtualization is easily supported. I might ditch VMware if XEN impresses me.
  7. It is loaded with software, and fast repos to download from. What more could one want?
All in all, I am very happy with OpenSuSE 11.0. It would not surprise me if it overtakes Ubuntu as the most popular distro in the near future.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Acroread Startup in OpenSuSe 11.0

It takes more than 30 seconds for acroread to load on my Opensuse machine the first time and the startup time gets shorter in subsequent attempts. Why? This is not the first time I have come across this problem of slow application startups in OpenSuse. Apparently a lot of people had encountered this problem and they found a simple solution - uninstalling the version of acroread that comes with OpenSuse and installing one from Adobe site yourself. Fortunately, that prescription seems to have solved the problem. My acroread startup time is a few seconds now. Why does a very good Linux distribution like OpenSuse with its wide support and following make so many of these mistakes?!?! Over the years, I have seen Suse/OpenSuse sending buggy distributions that make you wonder if they do much testing before releasing their distro. Here are a few bugs I have come across: The extremely slow startup of Openoffice in OpenSuse 10.0 was one of the reasons I switched to Fedora Core for a while...
1 comment
Read more

The Pervasive Mac vs. Windows vs. Linux Analogy

I'm sure everyone has seen the Mac vs. PC ads on TV where the Mac appears to be confident while th PC is in denial about its deficiencies. Missing from that picture is Linux which is robust, but seeks no attention because it has no commercial ambitions. This Mac vs. PC vs. Linux model can serve as a analogy for many things/phenomena. I would like to make a list of those analogies here. For example, The New York Times recently characterized Hillary as a PC and Obama as a mac on the basis of the design of their websites. The analogy would also work if you think of Hillary as the status quo much like Windows, and Obama as the new thing with great promise, cachet and appeal like the newly reborn mac. It is not obvious who would play the role of Linux, but my choice would be Ron Paul. He has some bold and independent ideas along with a very loyal following even though he has no chance of winning. PC Mac Linux Candidate Hillary Clinton Barack Obama Ron Paul States Northeast West Co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Tax-and-spend Liberal My Ass

This is a continuation of my earlier posts on economic performance of democratic and republican administrations. My earlier posts include: Politics of the Federal Minimum Wage Democrats Have Kept Unemployment Low Democrats care about poor people Truth About Economic Performance of Political Parties I like to think I have shed light on some facts and debunked some conventional wisdom. In this post, I will attempt to examine the tax-and-spend liberal label put on democrats. Republicans often try to label democrats as tax-and-spend liberals who are soft on national security. While the latter point is based on anecdotal evidence, the earlier is amenable to empirical examination. So, I set out to prove or disprove the notion that democrats often tax and spend in a way that does not yield economic growth. The implication of tax-and-spend liberal is one that puts excessive tax burden on its population and finds inefficient (think socialistic) ways of spending that tax reven...
Post a Comment
Read more